BETA: Chrome Capture for Channels

[babsonnexus]

@jator

Does this also allow you to do the same from CBS, Fox or ABC live streams on their websites?

If it has a direct link, you can do it:

@babsonnexus

More so, you can add any station you want that is not built in. Just add another record that looks like this:

#EXTINF:-1 channel-id="{YOUR STATION NAME}",{YOUR STATION NAME}
chrome://localhost:5589/stream?url={LINK}

Replace the {YOUR STATION NAME} and {LINK} fields to the ones you would like, so something like this:

There is no limit to how many of these you could to add! NOTE: Each Custom Channels m3u is limited to 500 stations, but there is no limit to the number of Custom Channels you can create.

[themediaguy]

Just did the docker setup and everything is working. But is it still not a way to link a provider as of yet still? I thought if I was signed into it on my Chrome browser I would have access.

[Hagary]

Trying this again. I mean, I see the provider question box pop up, but it won't let me select anything via mouse or keyboard even with the debug URL. Seems straightforward. Any idea what's up?

EDIT - seems like adblocker was interfering. Got rid of the popup, but no real keyboard input yet.

[Jim_FL]

Which provider? Here is Spectrum m3u:

#EXTINF:-1 channel-id="Golf",Golf
chrome://192.168.1.16:5589/stream?url=https://watch.spectrum.net/livetv?tmsid=61854

[Hagary]

Trying to get NBC to auth to YTTV. Still not getting any input control beyond closing that original prompt window, best I can tell...

[hjd]

For those in the US with a PBS affiliate that broadcasts online…

https://www.pbs.org/livestream or your respective station.

Works well with CC4C. @babsonnexus - might be a useful addition, though I would confirm it works for others as well. For me, both the above and my local affiliate livestreams work.

[Jim_FL]

I would make sure you can log in via a chrome browser on the maching you are using for chrome capture. Also on you could have issues with VPN. Sorry, I don't have YTTV. Not much help.

[Jim_FL]

Ran across this—-grabbing the URL from LiveTV in a web browser, and luckily it doesn’t change that often. CNN is currently https://tv.youtube.com/watch/4Ogm6iKafo4 , for instance. ESPN is https://tv.youtube.com/watch/bj3v-DQPnNs .

Also read YTTV is blocking some browsers.

[jator]

So was able to get ABC to work, however CBS won't. On a regular browser, I can get the live stream to work, but when I try and use through Chrome Capture, even after entering my Hulu credentials again, it says "Your TV provider is not yet supported in your location."

No VPN in use at time of testing, so not sure what's causing the regular Chrome Browser to be able to watch but not in the Chrome Capture. Any ideas?

Haven't tested FOX yet, need to wait until there's actual content being brodcasted.

Thanks.

[Jim_FL]

Here are 3 streams running on the AMD 5800H. No borders and no stuttering.

[Ahwman]

I’m having the exact same issue as you. After I confirm YouTube TV as my provider, it just sits there indefinitely. Very frustrating…

[babsonnexus]

@hjd

For those in the US with a PBS affiliate that broadcasts online…

https://www.pbs.org/livestream or your respective station.

Works well with CC4C. @babsonnexus - might be a useful addition, though I would confirm it works for others as well. For me, both the above and my local affiliate livestreams work.

For PBS specifically, I recommend doing this:

PBS Feeds

@miibeez, after consulting with @tmm1 to verify its safety, I went ahead and installed your solution. Have to say, it appears to be working fine after a bit of tweaking, so thanks for that! For transparency and safety reasons, I'd still ask that you make the code public on the Git. For everyone else looking to get their PBS back, here's the command I recommend: docker run -d --restart unless-stopped --name VLC_Bridge_PBS -p [PORT YOU LIKE]:7777 registry.gitlab.com/miibeez/vlc-bridge-pbs:late…

Works much better!

[babsonnexus]

@themediaguy

But is it still not a way to link a provider as of yet still? I thought if I was signed into it on my Chrome browser I would have access.

See:

BETA: Chrome Capture for Channels

Does this not work with you? Don't get me wrong, it is painfully slow, and I often found I needed to launch it about two to three times in a row before it responded to me. Then there is the issue of certain characters not being able to be typed as shown above... Some people have also noted that they can't seem to get the built-in station to work, but when they use the manual links it works fine. Also, although it is undocumented, you can also do a test in VLC. Just do something like this:

[sheepy]

Nothing wrong with that.

Seems the GPU in the 5800H is taking on quite a bit of that load. I'm going to play with some other GPU's and see Chrome will take advantage of other hardware.

[hofs1]

Well as far as my issue with "Watch | YES Network" its NOT the newer version of chrome blocking autoplay....i installed chrome 65 and still must click the volume button so back to the drawing board.

If any of you smart peeps want to dig in i can give u a login to see if its fixable.
seems way beyond my level.

[hjd]

Appreciate the pointer…but I have a strong aversion to docker-based solutions. Would love to get something like this up and running natively on a Mac or elsewhere…if you know of any pointers, would welcome it.

[Fofer]

I use macOS too but Docker Desktop has made the integration with Channels DVR pretty easy. I’m grateful for all of these (free!) integrations.

This executable is running here but a docker might work better?

@mnwxman132

For those that have tested the beta chrome capture on an M1 mac mini, what versions of OS have you used?

Mine’s running Ventura, updated to the latest release. A few crashes, I’ve detailed two above, hopefully those can be resolved.

I think the best would be if this beta project could be added as an experimental feature to the core Channels DVR server software. And then when the kinks get worked out, as an official one. I’m not sure if that’s feasible or not but I believe in the audacity of hope.

[Flt505]

Lets call this Dynamic Custom Channel:
I have this link to a beach cam: h ttp://bamabeachcams.com/sea-n-suds.aspx
I can use Chrome Capture for Channels to launch a Chrome window etc etc as this topic addresses.
I can also get an m3u url for this which works to make a Custom Channel, but lets say it Expires in 12 hours.
Not to bad, just keep updating the Custom Channel, but maybe there's a better way.
Here's what tmm1 says (somewhere):
"Chrome Capture for Channels captures the entire visible contents of the tab. Currently the code will look for a playing video on the page, size it...." etc
What if it could look for an m3u url on the page??
Then create a temp Dynamic Custom Channel, then the expires does not matter,
each time you use this it will get a new m3u with a new expires time.
This bypasses using a Chrome tab and the issues mentioned, borders, slow, etc
Thanks to anyone who cares to shoot this down, OR endorse.

[coolmaui]

@tmm1 Many of the sites that I was hoping to utilize your solution for are picky in that they seem to work best when used within a mobile browser. Is there any way to force an agent string that does not impact the rest of the user's chrome environment (ie only gets set for tabs that are instantiated by this package)? I am running the node package on M1 mac.

Edit: I managed to figure this out by adding this to the opts.args array object in main.js:

      `--args --user-agent='Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; {Android Version}; {Build Tag etc.}) AppleWebKit/{WebKit Rev} (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/{Chrome Rev} Mobile Safari/{WebKit Rev}'`,

Viewport scaling is handled much better now for the sites I am working with, but now the video no longer autoplays for me so I am trying to get that resolved.

[Ahwman]

After doing more testing, I compared the picture quality between running in a Docker vs the stand alone Mac app (Intel).

My observations:

• When running via Docker, the picture is full screen with no discernible borders, however it is very choppy.

• When running via the stand alone Mac app, the picture has borders on the sides, however it is much smoother.

I’m puzzled as to why there are no borders when running via Docker…