well, in a final effort to ensure no time is wasted on certificates for this solution for the forseeable future so that they can get back to iOS:
oh. my. Perception is not better than security. It’s fooling yourself. Its like setting your clock 10 minutes ahead to be on time. Just be on time.
how are they going to phish you into giving them a token? “Dear Mike, i’m a Nigerian prince with a million dollars. if you send me an OAUTH token for your DVR, I will make you rich”. nope, they are going to try and phish a corporate employee at Wal-Mart and steal a million user accounts and credit cards, or spear phish someone in accounting into a bank transfer.
Having a certificate on your sever doesn’t stop any of above behavior you mentioned. What it does do is makes the attack private! If a false sense of security is what your looking for, then try “Security through obscurity” and use Channels!
No hacker is trying to get into any ONE user’s NAS, they are trying to monetize the trouble they cause, by setting up an automated attack system with lots of users. If they want to hit personal users, they go after something with a large user-base and known vulnerabilities. like the My Cloud solution or Synology QuickConnect. (Both of which have had vulnerabilities and exploits created. Don’t use these directly on the Internet. EVER. use a VPN and keep your router patched). What are hackers going after? Millions of Windows and Andriod with a gazillion KNOWN and shared holes or 1000 DVRs with no know holes, and an insufficient user-base to bother. Lets take a look at WannaCry. they had 200,000 known infections against their 200,000,000 attempts, and only 200 people paid. Total bust compared to CryptoWall and their $325Million haul. The total channels community barely has 1000 users and some of them are arguing over $3/month. How many of them will be willing to pay $300-600 if someone encrypts their movies and TV?
PeaceOut
