You mean, beyond the DVR server for multiple platforms, and the clients across multiple platforms ... ?
1 Like
I was thinking more in terms of just something simple, like a DVR that worked.
Look, I don't know what business you're in, but if I told my customers they would have to do their own design work, they would have fired me 2 decades ago.
1 Like
That is how I have mine setup. In accessibility on the device I turn Captions always on.
1 Like
Channels has always been more a fundamentalist app so...it's parcel of the game of using this app. If you want convenience, just use the TV Provider's DVR...
1 Like
I don't recall seeing that in the advertising, but okay.
1 Like
When I ask Channels to record a program, it does. I can even use myriad rules to select things I didn't know would air, but they were recorded. So, how does Channels not act act as a DVR that works?
What "design" work are you asking for?
2 Likes
It depends but if you have a couple of USB-HDMI capture cards, you can easily use that with NextPVR as a backend
I've seen a few threads over on the NextPVR forum with users having success with those $3-$5 ones on ebay/Amazon.
I was hoping that when the software has a recording conflict due to limited tuners, that it might be able to resolve it, or at the very least, prompt the user 'immediately' that there is a problem that needs to be resolved.
1 Like
Post a link if you would please.
1 Like
This one is 14 bucks but I've seen some users have success with that
Here's the same device for cheaper
1 Like
Ah, sorry, I thought you were referring to a network HDMI encoder for $3.
1 Like
Edited above to include an ebay link for cheaper.
2 Likes
You also have to get the Streaming Boxes .. Network Switches or great WIFI. Yes I use NEXTPVR for it allows me to do my own bat files and runs them. Believe me I have invested more than I should have to record Shows I can easily download.
1 Like
Yeah...an onn device runs you 20 bucks each so that's not bad. If you want ethernet, then you could get a Chromecast or FireTV 4k for double that
2 Likes
For a while there, I had a network cable plugged into a PC, but clearly we've gone way beyond that kind of simplicity as a user.
+1
1 Like
Commitment, man. And I thought using my oldass Mac with CC4C with the lid closed and on power was top class 
1 Like
You're right. I understand that many users came to Channels because of their TVE integration. The problem with it however is two-fold: not all providers support TVE the same, and not all networks support TVE in the same manner.
This dichotomy has led to a lopsided Venn diagram that is ever-shifting. As I have been a Channels user before TVE was offered, I was unaware that they marketed its support on their website, without disclosing its beta status. For the users that only purchased a DVR subscription because of the TVE support, I'm sorry you find yourselves in this untenable situation. For those whining about the state of things but who have been from the beginning, admit to your false surprise.
If anyone has spent more than 5 minutes reading the forums, they would realize how fragile the TVE system within Channels is.
However, I doubt anyone looking to Channels would consider it a "turnkey" solution as you state, since it requires:
- a network tuner
- an always-on computer
- dedicated DVR software
That is anything but turnkey!
1 Like
Ya, i'm hoping for a lot more features incoming for virtual custom channels.
4 Likes