Just because u pay for something, doesn't mean you are so entitled to get what you want all the time. Or that what u pay for is up to your standards and has no issues with your hardware and use case.
The maker and provider of the service has no obligation to put your issues ahead of anyone else. Or to set aside their production plans to service a small group of users that have a compatibility issue with just one feature that does not effect the core function of the service. But, it also is not a good thing if they just calllusly dismiss your issues...which they have not done. They have been more than enough response and tried to help you for each of your Sony issues. But even they will need to give up and move on at some point.
From my point of view, yes, you are very much forthcoming and transparent with your issues...but there is such a thing as being too much so. U sometimes, come across as over entitled and pushy to get the Channels Devs to fix your issues for your Sony TV. Proven by your statement and the response by the dev for that statement.
You have succeeded in proving that Sony TVs suck with Channels DVR.
You have brought to light some very valid issues that need hammering out at some point, if and when they deam them a priority enough.
But, all u seem to find is more and more issues in regards to Sony TVs...
At some-point, you are just either just deal with the issues, or get a different tv??
I too have some issues that I would like to see fixed with Channels and my Nvidia Shield.
(Having to use Hybrid Decode for certain SD stations, Surround Sound option fixed, and a few other nit picky things) But i am not constantly pestering the devs asking when are they gonna fix it, they need to fix it fast cause i paid to use their software. (Though, we all have our moments of getting upset and frustrated and lashing out....)
Do not mean to attack u or to defend Channels, this is just how i, a third party and fellow user, sees and interpret your posts on these topics over time.