Interesting idea. In the past, @turtletank has expressed reluctance to add full scripting to ADBTuner. Although, as one looks at the evolution of ADBTuner over the last three years, it's come closer and closer to ah4c in terms of power-user features.
I'm one of the developers of ah4c, but I use both ah4c and ADBTuner, as they've been fairly well differentiated in terms of which is better suited for various tasks. Though I'd be happy to see ADBTuner expanded to include scripting and arbitrary ADB commands, and would no doubt use any expanded feature set, I find myself wondering about the future of ah4c in such a scenario.
I have total confidence and trust in @turtletank, but at the same time, I'm an open source guy at heart. Even though Channels itself is not open source, the developers have done an excellent job of providing hooks for community projects. With very few exceptions, those community projects have been open source, with each of us having the option to review and/or expand the project.
ADBTuner has been an exception, and is not open source. I know many of us have wished this were not the case, but every developer has the 100% right to decide for themselves whether they want their project to be in the public domain (though subject to licensing) or not.
There have been requests in the past for ADBTuner to become open source, and I'd like to renew that request -- especially in light of the idea of ADBTuner adding full scripting. If that happens, and I hope it does
, it seems like that would be an appropriate moment to deprecate ah4c. Probably the only reason to continue maintaining it at that point would be to have an open source alternative to ADBTuner.






